But! There is a significant exception for piano stuff - the so-often mentioned "playability" aspect, which make Pianoteq pianos invaluable for everyday practice. Up to my weighted opinion good old sampling technology up to date still beats all Modartt's modelled instruments, including pianos in most obvious sonic aspects. So what? Where is the win here, I would really like to know it realistically. I found this advanced project for pipe organ controller, but it's in portuguese and there is no tecnical details : Some people buy parts/components of of eletronic organ to use in DIY MIDI projetcs : So I propose we search some DIY (Do it yourself) MIDI pedalbaord projects, to find the best one to public in this forum. Some old used electric organs are the oprice of a good new MIDI pedalboard. What about a didactic video for pipe organ, and a didactic video about organteq (pro version coming) ? Maybe amini video context with a 50% off discount as reward or something like that ?Īnd many people don't buy organ emulator cause they would need a pedalboard, and midi pedalboard use to be expansive. Maybe they could be more ionterested in organ emulator if they know more about how a organ works. Many people who play piano also like to listen pipe organs, but don't understant very well how a real pipe organ works in details, the many adjstments for stops, the registers, the use of pedals.
Overdrive simulation is topnotch (and I love my organs overdriven!). I do think Blue3 wins overall, based on the demos. I do have B5, and it's pretty good, but I still like VB3 more, somehow. No interest in VB3 32-bit is dead to me.ĪFAIK Blue3 is completely modelled. If you know, I'd be curious to hear how they compare. Have you compared Blue 3 to Acoustic Samples' B5 (sampled/modelled hybrid)? The new v2.2 is supposed to cut down on resource usage, but before that v2 was reportedly pretty CPU instensive. Is Blue 3 completely modelled? I had forgotten that. GSI VB3 is the old contender (REALLY easy on CPU, still sounds absolutely great). Personally I have no interest in a pipe organ, but would love a modelled tonewheel organ which was easy enough on computer resources that it could play well with MainStage in addition to Pianoteq. Niclas- I’m sure Mario is in the beta (alpha?) testing group and his statement is an accurate reflection of current plans, but I’d like to put in a word for a modeled tonewheel organ.
#MODARTT PIANOTEQ 5 VST TORRENT REGISTRATION#
tracker action on/off, registration changes etc? Registration/sound can be tweaked to emulate small instruments from, say, 17th century to the present? Will different temperaments/pitches be available? (Sure they will) Action sounds - e.g. Is the alpha version equal temperament? Not an expert at all, but it didn't quite sound like it. Questions, which Modartt may choose not answer of course. I have found organising registration/manual changes in Hauptwerk difficult. I am sure Modartt is capable of producing a similar small instrument which sounds at least as good and with the facility to tweak. (I also use the central and right pedals for reverting to lower and upper 8's for playing the continuous French rondeaux.) The Oosterwijtwerd has a very fine sound: a friend of a friend heard me playing the Pachelbel Aria Sebaldina he came from that area and said it was like walking into the church. Modartt may do the usual magic with more global changes via the pedals. Presumably the instrument will have a limited number of registers and compass, so that registration changes can be made via the unused notes as per alpha version, as I do with the Ruckers.
#MODARTT PIANOTEQ 5 VST TORRENT MANUALS#
Manuals only - my footwork is limited to sustain pedals etc. I have so far done my organ playing (Sweelinck, Pachelbel, JS Bach etc), via Hauptwerk, on the Mariakerk, Oosterwijtwerd instrument and also the 1636 organ of San Carlo, Brescia. Love the 4' sound, the 8' flute sounds a bit "tubby and soft" through my system.
0 kommentar(er)
